ACT考试系列解读

给大家分享一个小故事，这是一个ACT考试的一个小练习，看完之后记得要思考哦~

        In1 970, the school board in Pittsfield, New Hampshire, approved a dress code that prohibited students from wearing certain types of 【1】clothing. The School board members believed that wearing “play clothes” to school made the students【2】inefficient toward their school work, while more formal attire established a positive educational climate. When twelve-year-old Kevin Bannister wore a pair of blue jeans to school, he was sent home for violating the dress code.

     【3】Kevin and his parents believed that his constitutional rights had been violated. The United States District 【4】Court of New Hampshire; agreed to hear Kevin’s case. His claim was based on the notion of personal liberty –the right of every individual to the control of his or her own person—protected by the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. The Court agreed with Kevin that a person’s right 【5】for wearing clothing of his or her own choosing is, in fact, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

       970年，新罕布什尔州皮茨菲尔德市的学校董事会通过了一项着装规定，禁止学生穿某些类型的衣服。校董会成员认为，穿“运动服”上学会让学生对学习效率低下，而更正式的着装则会营造一种积极的教育氛围。当12岁的凯文·班尼斯特穿着一条蓝色牛仔裤去上学时，他因为违反了着装规定而被送回家。

　　凯文和他的父母认为他的宪法权利受到了侵犯。美国新罕布什尔州地区法院;同意听凯文的案子。他的主张基于个人自由的概念，即受宪法第十四修正案保护的每个人控制自己的权利。法院同意凯文的观点，一个人穿自己选择的衣服的权利实际上受到第十四条修正案的保护。

        以上就是我今天给大家分享的小故事啦~想知道更多有趣的故事和最新的考试资源和最新动向记得关注我们的网站哦~