ACT写作评分标准中的分析与评估讲解

　　ACT难考吗，ACT考试比SAT更容易一些，尤其对中国的考生来说，选择ACT考试可能更容易在短期内获得相对满意的成绩，所以有很多的小伙伴都在备考ACT考试，而对于ACT考试，大家总有一个问题，那就是ACT写作有没有什么评分的标准呢？今天小编就给大家带来了ACT写作评分标准中的分析与评估讲解。

　　ACT写作评分标准——分析与评估

　　ACT writing scoring standard——Analysis and evaluation.

　　1) 事物特征

　　1) characteristics of things.

　　2) 人的特征

　　2) Human characteristics.

　　3) 对事和物的分类

　　3) Classification of matters and objects.

　　4) 人与事物的关系

　　4) the relationship between people and things.

　　5) 他人观点的前提，立场，潜台词

　　5) the premise, position, and subtext of another person's point of view.

　　6) 建立自己的评估标准

　　6) establish its own evaluation criteria.

　　7) 分析的广度和深度大于题目观点

　　7) the breadth and depth of the analysis is greater than the subject point of view.

　　第一项是关于分析与评估。

　　The first is about analysis and evaluation.

　　区别于过去的考试，这一项考察考生对事物的分析过程，对评估过程要求更加深入和具体。

　　Different from the past examination, this item examines the examinee to the thing analysis process, to the appraisal process request is more thorough and the concrete.

　　首先我们要对这个最基本的问题进行考察，

　　First of all, we want to examine this most basic question.

　　以官方样题intelligent machine举例，对于这个事物，要对它进行分类讨论。

　　Take the official sample intelligent machine as an example. For this thing, we need to discuss it in categories.

　　在分类讨论的过程当中，对于这个机器它有多少种类，各个种类有什么样的特征，再去整合这一大类机器总体有什么样的特征。

　　In the process of classifying and discussing, how many kinds of machines are there, what are the characteristics of each category, and what are the characteristics of this large category of machines as a whole?

　　总结了这些特征之后，我们还要去比对人的特征，人的需求。

　　After summing up these characteristics, we have to go to compare the characteristics of people, human needs.

　　人的特征与需求与这个机器的一个关系，机器是否满足人们的需求。

　　Human characteristics and needs and the relationship between the machine, whether the machine meets the needs of people.

　　它在满足人们需求之后，又带来什么样的这个结果。

　　After it meets people's needs, what kind of results will it bring?

　　这些结果当中有好，是否也有不好。

　　Some of these results are good, and some are not.

　　人们在制作使用机器的时候，是否也牺牲了一些东西作为代价。

　　Do people make and use machines at the expense of something else?

　　这些是我们讨论的最基本的问题，即它是什么，它将如何分类。

　　These are the most basic questions we discuss, namely, what it is and how it will be classified.

　　这些分类当中具体有什么特征，这些特征与人的关系是什么样子。

　　What are the specific characteristics of these classifications, and what is the relationship between these characteristics and people?

　　按照这个逻辑，写作考试具体的执行方法其实是把事物分类，把人分类，然后再把两个分类进行匹配对比。

　　According to this logic, the specific implementation of the writing test is actually the classification of things, the classification of people, and then the two categories are matched and compared.

　　那么我们来看一下，针对题目关健词进行了分析之后，还要根据文章给的要求，对题目给出的三个观点进行分析。

　　So let's take a look. After analyzing the key words of the topic, we should also analyze the three points of view given by the article according to the requirements given in the article.

　　我们有了自己的观点以及展开观点的过程，要求去结合我已有的信息，这些信息包括最基本的常识知识，也包括我主观的价值评价体系，

　　We have our own opinions and the process of developing them, requiring the combination of the information I already have, which includes the most basic common sense knowledge, as well as my subjective value system.

　　以这些为基础再对题目给出的三个观点进行细致的分析。

　　On the basis of these, the paper gives a detailed analysis of the three points of view given by the topic.

　　比如，这三个观点中这个人说话的前提或者立场是谁在说这个话，这个话的讨论的范围，他的情感以及这个话里是不是有弦外之音。

　　For example, in these three points of view, the premise or position of the person's words is who is saying the words, the scope of the discussion of the words, his feelings, and whether there is an implied meaning in the words.

　　根据已有的内容，和我刚才建立的评估标准，针对题目给出的观点进行一个评价：他说的，我同意，我不同意，或者我部分同意。

　　On the basis of what has been said and the evaluation criteria I have just established, a comment is made on the viewpoint given in the subject: what he said, I agree, I do not agree with him, or I agree in part.

　　那部分同意的时候，哪些同意哪些又不同意，这个也需要考生在卷面上讲清楚。

　　When that part agrees, which agrees which does not agree, this also needs the examinee to explain clearly on the paper surface.

　　对于一个满分或者是高分写作的文章要求，考生论证的深度和广度应该大于题目给出的这三个点，比如intelligent machine这道题，

　　For an essay written with full or high marks, the depth and breadth of the argument should be greater than the three points given in the question, such as the intelligent machine question.

　　它的第一个观点认为人们在用机器代替人去做很多事情的时候，会有一些损失，这些损失是在人性方面的损失，它也在这个观点当中举了具体的例子，

　　Its first point of view is that when people use machines to do many things instead of people, there will be some losses, these losses are in the loss of human nature, it also gives specific examples in this view.

　　比如对他人的尊重和包容。

　　Such as respect and tolerance for others.

　　但是我在写的时候，可以比这个范围更大。

　　But when I write it, I can do it on a much larger scale than that.

　　以上就是小编今天带来的关于ACT写作的全部内容，希望对大家有所帮助，想了解更多关于ACT写作标准的内容，请多多关注本网站，也可以添加微信号kewo11。